Caesar Augustus as Jove incarnate. The Roman Empire was, before
Constantine, a quasi-theocracy. Opinion in both late antiquity and later history, however, regards negatively
Emperors, such as
Caligula and
Domitian, who assumed that dignity in life.
[citation needed] By contrast, each
Pharaoh of Egypt, as
Horus incarnate, son of Amun-Ra, Osiris in death, etc. (as in other cultures) was held to be a living god.
Theocracy or
Ecclesiocracy, according to dictionary, is the "government of a state by immediate divine guidance or by officials who are regarded as divinely guided."
[1] The
Oxford English Dictionary has this definition:
- A form of government in which God (or a deity) is recognized as the king or immediate ruler, and his laws are taken as the statute-book of the kingdom, these laws being usually administered by a priestly order as his ministers and agents; hence (loosely) a system of government by a sacerdotal order, claiming a divine commission; also, a state so governed.[2]
Synopsis[edit]
The word theocracy comes from the Greek words θεός (Theos), "God", and κρατία (kratia), "power, strength", and means "rule of God." A theocracy is a form in which the
deity is considered immediate authority. In some religions, the king was regarded as the son of god and could not be even questioned; the attitude that the Quran declares should be taken towards the unique God:
He (God) is not questioned of what he does and they shall be questioned.
Today, there is also a form of government where clerics have the power. From the perspective of the theocratic government, "God himself is recognized as the head" of the state,
[4] hence the term
theocracy, from the
Koine Greek θεοκρατία "rule of God", a term used by
Josephus for the
kingdoms of Israel and Judah.
[5]
Taken literally or strictly,
theocracy means rule by God or gods and refers primarily to an internal "rule of the heart", especially in its biblical application. The common, generic use of the term, as defined above in terms of rule by a church or analogous religious leadership, would be more accurately described as an
ecclesiocracy.
[6]
In a pure theocracy, the civil leader is believed to have a personal connection with the civilization's religion or belief. For example,
Moses led the Israelites, and
Muhammad ruled the early Muslims. There is a fine line between the tendency of appointing religious characters to run the state and having a religious-based government. According to the Holy Books, Prophet Joseph was offered an essential governmental role just because he was trustworthy, wise and knowledgeable:
And the king (of Egypt) said:Bring him to me. I will appoint him exclusively for myself. So when he (Joseph) spoke to him, (the king) said: Indeed, you are now established (in position), fully-trusted.
(Joseph) said, Appoint me in charge of the treasures of the land. I will indeed guard it, as an expert.
As a result of the Prophet Joseph's knowledge (Quran 12:47) also due to his ethical and genuine efforts during a critical economic situation, the whole nation was rescued from a seven-year drought. When religions have a "holy book," it is used as a direct message from God. Law proclaimed by the ruler is also considered a divine revelation, and hence the law of God. As to the Prophet Muhammad ruling, "The first thirteen of the Prophet's twenty-three year career went on totally apolitical and non-violent. This attitude partly changed only after he had to flee form Mecca to Medina. This hijra would be a turning point in the Prophet's mission and would mark the very beginning of the Muslim calendar. Yet, interestingly, the Prophet did not establish a theocracy in Medina. Instead of a polity defined solely by Islam, he founded a territorial polity based on religious pluralism. This is evident in a document called the ’Charter of Medina’, which the Prophet signed with the leaders of the other community in the city."
[9] An
ecclesiocracy, on the other hand, is a situation where the religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are instruments of divine revelation. For example, the
prince-bishops of the European Middle Ages, where the bishop was also the temporal ruler. Such a state may use the administrative hierarchy of the religion for its own administration, or it may have two 'arms' — administrators and clergy — but with the state administrative hierarchy subordinate to the religious hierarchy. The papacy in the
Papal States occupied a middle ground between theocracy and ecclesiocracy, since the pope did not claim he was a prophet who received revelation from God and translated it into civil law.
Religiously endorsed monarchies fall between these two poles, according to the relative strengths of the religious and political organs.
Theocracy is distinguished from other, secular forms of government that have a
state religion, or are influenced by theological or moral concepts, and
monarchies held "
By the Grace of God". In the most common usage of the term, some civil rulers are leaders of the dominant
religion (e.g., the
Byzantine emperor as patron and defender of the official Church); the government proclaims it rules on behalf of
God or a higher power, as specified by the local religion, and divine approval of government institutions and laws. These characteristics apply also to a
caesaropapist regime. The Byzantine Empire however was not theocratic since the patriarch answered to the emperor, not vice versa; similarly in Tudor England the crown forced the church to break away from Rome so the royal (and, especially later, parliamentary) power could assume full control of the now
Anglicanhierarchy and confiscate most church property and income.
Secular governments can also co-exist with a state religion or delegate some aspects of civil law to religious communities. For example, in
Israel marriage is governed by officially recognized religious bodies who each provide marriage services for their respected adherents, yet no form of civil marriage (free of religion, for atheists, for example) exists nor marriage by non-recognized minority religions. India similarly delegates control of marriage and some other civil matters to the religious communities, in large part as a way of accommodating its Muslim minority.
[citation needed]
Etymology[edit]
The word
theocracy originates from the Greek θεοκρατία meaning "the rule of God". This in turn derives from
θεός (
theos), meaning "god", and
κρατέω (
krateo), meaning "to rule." Thus the meaning of the word in Greek was "rule by
god(s)" or human incarnation(s) of god(s).
The term was initially coined by
Flavius Josephus in the first century A.D. to describe the characteristic government of the
Jews. Josephus argued that while mankind had developed many forms of rule, most could be subsumed under the following three types:
monarchy,
oligarchy, and
democracy. The government of the Jews, however, was unique. Josephus offered the term "theocracy" to describe this polity, ordained by Moses, in which God is sovereign and his word is law.
[10]
Josephus' definition was widely accepted until the
Enlightenment era, when the term started to collect more universalistic
[clarification needed] and negative
connotations, especially in
Hegel's hands. The first recorded English use was in 1622, with the meaning "sacerdotal government under divine inspiration" (as in Biblical Israel before the rise of kings); the meaning "priestly or religious body wielding political and civil power" is recorded from 1825.
Current theocracies[edit]
Christian theocracies[edit]
Holy See (Vatican City)[edit]
Following the
Capture of Rome on 20 September 1870, the
Papal States including Rome with the
Vatican were annexed by the
Kingdom of Italy. In 1929, with the
Lateran Treatysigned with the Italian Government, the new state of
Vatican City (population 842) - with no connection with the former Papal States
[11]- was formally created and recognized as an independent state.
[12] The head of state of the Vatican is the
pope, elected by the
College of Cardinals, an assembly of Senatorial-princes of the Church, who are usually clerics, appointed as Ordinaries, but in the past have also included men who were not bishops nor clerics.
[12] A pope is elected for life, and either dies or may resign.
Voting is limited to cardinals under 80 years of age.
[12] A Secretary for Relations with States, directly responsible for international relations, is appointed by the pope. The Vatican legal system is rooted in
canon law but ultimately is decided by the pope; the Bishop of Rome as the
Supreme Pontiff,
"has the fullness of legislative, executive and judicial powers."[13] Although the laws of Vatican City come from the secular laws of Italy, under article 3 of the Law of the Sources of the Law, provision is made for the supplementary application of the “laws promulgated by the Kingdom of Italy.”
[14] The government of the Vatican can also be considered an ecclesiocracy (ruled by the
Church).
Islamic states or Islamic theocracies[edit]
Main articles:
Islamic state and
Sharia
An
Islamic state is a state that has adopted
Islam, specifically Sharia, as its foundations for political institutions, or laws, exclusively, and has implemented the Islamic ruling system
khilafah (Arabic: خلافة), and is therefore a theocracy. Although there is much debate as to which states or groups operate strictly according to Islamic Law, Sharia is the official basis for state laws in the following countries:
Afghanistan,
Iran,
Mauritania,
Saudi Arabia,
Sudan, and
Yemen. In
Nigeria, the constitution provides that states may elect to use Shari'a laws and courts, though non-Muslims are not required in any state to submit to Shari'a jurisdiction and adherence varies by state.
[15]
Pakistan has Islam as its only official religion and its
Federal Shariat Court has the duty of striking down any law not complying with the
Sharia code of Islamic law; however, ruling falls upon legal scholars who, while required to be Muslim, are not religious clerics.
The
Islamic Republic of Iran has been described as a "theocratic republic" (by the
US Central Intelligence Agency),
[16] and its constitution a "hybrid" of "theocratic and democratic elements" by Francis Fukuyama.
[17] Like other Islamic states, it maintains religious laws and has religious courts to interpret all aspects of law. According to Iran's constitution, "all civil, penal financial, economic, administrative, cultural, military, political, and other laws and regulations must be based on Islamic criteria."
[18]
In addition, Iran has a religious ruler and many religious officials in powerful government posts. The head of state, or "
Supreme Leader", is a
faqih[19] (scholar of Islamic law), and possesses more power than
Iran's president. The Leader appoints the heads of many powerful posts: the commanders of
the armed forces, the director of the
national radio and television network, the heads of the powerful
major religious foundations, the
chief judge, the chief prosecutor, special tribunals, and members of
national security councilsdealing with defence and foreign affairs. He also co-appoints the 12 jurists of the
Guardian Council.
[20]
Another body, the
Council of Guardians, has the power to veto bills from
majlis (parliament), approve or disapprove candidates who wish to run for high office (president, majlis, the Assembly of Experts). The council supervises elections, and can greenlight or ban investigations into the election process.
[16] Six of the Guardians (half the council) are faqih empowered to approve or veto all bills from the
majlis (parliament) according to whether the faqih believe them to be in accordance with Islamic law and customs (
Sharia). The other six members are lawyers appointed by the head of the judiciary (who is also a cleric and also appointed by the Leader).
[23]
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant[edit]
Central Tibetan Administration[edit]
The
Central Tibetan Administration, colloquially known as the Tibetan government in exile, is a
Tibetan exile organisation with a state-like internal structure. According to its charter, the position of head of state of the Central Tibetan Administration belongs
ex officio to the current
Dalai Lama, a religious hierarch. In this respect, it continues the traditions of the
former government of Tibet, which was ruled by the Dalai Lamas and their ministers, with a specific role reserved for a class of
monk officials.
On March 14, 2011, at the
14th Dalai Lama's suggestion, the parliament of the Central Tibetan Administration began considering a proposal to remove the Dalai Lama's role as head of state in favor of an elected leader.
Before 2011, the
Kalön Tripa position was subordinate to the
14th Dalai Lama[26] who presided over the government in exile from its founding.
[27] In August of that year, Lobsang Sangay polled 55 per cent votes out of 49,189, defeating his nearest rival Tethong Tenzin Namgyal by 8,646 votes,
[citation needed] becoming the second popularly elected Kalon Tripa. The Dalai Lama announced that his political authority would be transferred to Sangay.
[28]
Change to Sikyong[edit]
On September 20, 2012, the 15th Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile unanimously voted to change the title of Kalön Tripa to
Sikyong in Article 19 of the Charter of the Tibetans in exile and relevant articles.
[29] The Dalai Lama had previously referred to the Kalon Tripa as Sikyong, and this usage was cited as the primary justification for the name change. According to
Tibetan Review, "Sikyong" translates to "political leader", as distinct from "spiritual leader".
[30] Foreign affairs Kalon
Dicki Chhoyang stated that the term "Sikyong" has had a precedent dating back to the
7th Dalai Lama, and that the name change "ensures historical continuity and legitimacy of the traditional leadership from the fifth Dalai Lama".
[31] The online Dharma Dictionary translates sikyong (
srid skyong) as "secular ruler; regime, regent."
[32] The title
sikyong had previously been used by
regents who ruled Tibet during the Dalai Lama's minority.
States with official state religion[edit]
Main article:
State religion
Having a state religion is not sufficient to be a theocracy in the narrow sense. Many countries have a state religion without the government directly deriving its powers from a divine authority or a religious authority directly exercising governmental powers. Since the narrow sense has few instances in the modern world, the more common usage is the wider sense of an enforced state religion.
Historic states with theocratic aspects[edit]
Buddhism[edit]
Unified religious rule in Tibet began in 1642, when the
Fifth Dalai Lama allied with the military power of the Mongol
Gushri Khan to consolidate the political power and center control around his office as head of the Gelug school.
[33] This form of government is known as the
dual system of government. Prior to 1642, particular monasteries and monks had held considerable power throughout Tibet, but had not achieved anything approaching complete control, though power continued to be held in a diffuse, feudal system after the ascension of the Fifth Dalai Lama. Power in Tibet was held by a number of traditional elites, including members of the nobility, the heads of the major Buddhist sects (including their various
tulkus), and various large and influential monastic communities.
[34]
Political power was sometimes used by monastic leaders to suppress rival religious schools through the confiscation of property and direct violence.
[33][35] Social mobility was somewhat possible through the attainment of a monastic education, or recognition as a reincarnated teacher, but such institutions were dominated by the traditional elites and governed by political intrigue.
[34] Non-Buddhists in Tibet were members of an outcast underclass.
[34]
Similar to the Roman Emperor, the
Chinese sovereign was historically held to be the
Son of Heaven however from the first historical Emperor on, this was largely ceremonial and tradition quickly established it as a posthumous dignity, like the Roman institution. The situation before
Qin Shi Huang Di is less clear.
The
Shang dynasty essentially functioned as a theocracy, declaring the ruling family the sons of heaven and calling the chief sky god
Shangdi after a word for their deceased ancestors.
[36] After their overthrow by the
Zhou, the royal clan of Shang were not eliminated but instead moved to a ceremonial capital where they were charged to continue the performance of their rituals.
As a result, some
Sinologists translate the title
huangdi (usually rendered "
emperor") as
thearch. The term properly refers to the head of a thearchy (a kingdom of gods), but the more accurate "theocrat" carries associations of a strong priesthood that would be generally inaccurate in describing imperial China. Others reserve the use of "thearch" to describe the legendary figures of Chinese prehistory while continuing to use "emperor" to describe historical rulers.
[36]
The Sunni branch of Islam stipulates that, as a head of state, a Caliph should be elected by Muslims or their representatives. Followers of Shia Islam, however, believe a Caliph should be an Imam chosen by God from the Ahl al-Bayt (the "Family of the House", Muhammad's direct descendants).
Byzantine Empire[edit]
Jennifer Fretland VanVoorst argues, "The Byzantine Empire became a theocracy in the sense that Christian values and ideals were the foundation of the empire's political ideals and heavily entwined with its political goals."
[37] Steven Runciman says in his book on
The Byzantine Theocracy (2004):
- The constitution of the Byzantine Empire was based on the conviction that it was the earthly copy of the Kingdom of Heaven. Just as God ruled in Heaven, so the Emperor, made in his image, should rule on earth and carry out his commandments....It saw itself as a universal empire. Ideally, it should embrace all the peoples of the Earth who, ideally, should all be members of the one true Christian Church, its own Orthodox Church. Just as man was made in God's image, so man's kingdom on Earth was made in the image of the Kingdom of Heaven."[38]
Geneva and Zurich[edit]
Historians debate the extent to which Geneva, Switzerland, in the days of
John Calvin (1509–64) was a theocracy. On the one hand, Calvin's theology clearly called for separation between church and state. Other historians have stressed the enormous political power wielded on a daily basis by the clerics.
[39][40]
In nearby
Zurich, Switzerland, Protestant reformer
Huldrych Zwingli (1484-1531) built a political system that many scholars have called a theocracy, while others have denied it.
[41]
Mormons (Deseret)[edit]
The question of theocracy has been debated at extensively by historians regarding the
Mormon communities in Illinois, and especially in Utah.
[42][43][44]
Joseph Smith, mayor of
Nauvoo, Illinois, and founder of the Mormon movement, ran as an independent for president in 1844. He proposed the redemption of slaves by selling public lands; reducing the size and salary of Congress; the closure of prisons; the
annexation of Texas, Oregon, and parts of Canada; the securing of international rights on high seas;
free trade; and the re-establishment of a
national bank.
[45] His top aide
Brigham Young campaigned for Smith saying, "He it is that God of Heaven designs to save this nation from destruction and preserve the Constitution."
[46] The campaign ended when Smith was
killed by a mob while in the Carthage, Illinois, jail on June 27, 1844.
[47]
After severe persecution, the Mormons left the United States and resettled in a remote part of Utah, which was then part of Mexico. However the United States took control in 1848 and would not accept polygamy. The Mormon
State of Deseret was short-lived.
[48] Its original borders stretched from western
Colorado to the
southern California coast. When the Mormons arrived in the valley of the
Great Salt Lake in 1847, the
Great Basin was still a part of Mexico and had no secular government. As a result,
Brigham Youngadministered the region both spiritually and temporally through the highly organized and centralized
Melchizedek Priesthood. This original organization was based upon a concept called
theodemocracy, a governmental system combining Biblical theocracy with mid-19th-century American political ideals.
[49][50]
In 1849, the Saints organized a secular government in Utah, although many ecclesiastical leaders maintained their positions of secular power. The Mormons also petitioned Congress to have Deseret admitted into the Union as a state. However, under the
Compromise of 1850,
Utah Territory was created and Brigham Young was appointed governor. In this situation, Young still stood as head of the LDS Church as well as Utah's secular government.
After the abortive
Utah War of 1857–1858, the replacement of Young by an outside Federal Territorial Governor, intense federal prosecution of Mormon church leaders, and the eventual resolution of controversies regarding
plural marriage, and accession by Utah to statehood, the apparent temporal aspects of LDS
theodemocracy receded markedly.
[51]
Western Antiquity[edit]
The
imperial cults in
Ancient Egypt and the
Roman Empire, as well as numerous other monarchies, deified the ruling monarch. The state religion was often dedicated to the worship of the ruler as a deity, or the incarnation thereof.
Early Israel was ruled by Judges before instituting a monarchy. The Judges were believed to be representatives of YHVH
Yahweh (in Latin,
Jehovah).
In ancient and medieval Christianity,
Caesaropapism is the doctrine where a head of state is at the same time the head of the church.
Zoroastrianism[edit]
During the
Achaemenid Empire, Zoroastrianism was the state religion and included formalized worship. The Persian kings were known to be pious Zoroastrians and also ruled with a Zoroastrian form of law called
asha. However,
Cyrus the Great, who founded the empire, avoided imposing the Zoroastrian faith on the inhabitants of conquered territory. Cyrus's kindness towards Jews has been cited
[citation needed] as sparking Zoroastrian influence on Judaism.
Under the Seleucids, Zoroastrianism became autonomous. During the
Sassanid period, the Zoroastrian calendar was reformed, image-use was banned, Fire Temples were increasingly built and intolerance towards other faiths prevailed.
[52]
In the
Byzantine Empire (324-1453 AD) the
Emperor was the head of civil society. He also exercised authority over the ecclesiastical authorities, or
patriarchates. The emperor was considered to be God's omnipotent representative on earth and he ruled as an absolute
autocrat.
[53]
The short reign (1494–1498) of
Girolamo Savonarola, a
Dominican priest, over the city of Florence had features of a theocracy. During his rule, "un-Christian" books, statues, poetry, and other items were burned (in the
Bonfire of the Vanities),
sodomy was made a capital offense, and other Christian practices became law.
