Sunday, November 15, 2015

The Reality Of Getting Hi

Shall the general Public Title this little statement Science Friction,
the poll it Coals on their Podium of a stand that says Earth is a 5000 Year Old flat World to busy to buzz staggering,
is the note on the bust a Treasury of end game,
or is the berth of a harbor just the very next shoe In the forge of Humanity,
marking the Tea Party with a POE light on ed grrr Owl in's wrench to the riders of the future.

Is the saddle of the girth or the cinch just a Horn or the Close Contact type of Sports write,
defining the plates on license fees to register the arm of the anchor to a Simon says gamers Hi way,
has any one person heard of the 5th Amendment,
for todays shelf of this library I simply wretch that Bill Mayer has done the all law term called self-incrimination,
translation stall to the English Language broken down society at in *crim. a Nation.

* crim.
1. criminal.

Is It Really Just Fielding A Plant For The Weed Telling The Audience Its Grass While The Hosting Clocks To Hip Hop Or Is It Modern Day Mow Town

As the great storm of the new or leans is in the reality of the locale to a harbor for said signs,
as talk is of share in trade the Venue on the dock it is at the learn of the stand,
to course is the rein,
no banshee required as the truth is the core to a type of Picket fence,
stride long to ride down pass churned for it is only in a Stock Tank or a pond,
this is an oh shin us beyond the lies to obtain a caliber of true status,
a yards extension is in the yearn to obtain the value of that stage,
in the minute hour of more than a Cause it is the Idea that charges the Release to CAP shin Honor.

On the forth of the Edge of Tomorrow is in the Ability to system Mat tick the price of Price fixed,
from shed to Tool the basic Branch of office is the box,
a particular British term,
Home a Dress to the instead of asking for a Signature line would be more like Singing into the Can,
with proper patience the awe of all law is as the steady Dates a Lot,
during the Mick Car thee Is Um error this is the strength of just a residence to state Mint,
what is a little bit funny is the tremendous dust storm of based on real lives with no name change to protect the in owe cent.

Often the chaos of roundabout fountain brights will Push to the after on the once a pawn a time,
should the ready theater feather a beau uh it is as the flight of an eagle on the soar,
being of A Sounding Board it is those Bill bored's that have brought gear to shift,
weather per Mitt ding The Bell on the ring around the Rosy Theme,
hour on the Print Shop to that simple presence of method,
a show of not Violets to flower the Wreath,
this is a real day 'Z' chain bringing the Movie 'Oblivion' a state of blast off.

For language is in the real time on silents,
see org. on the Blue Shore of building a Sailors shipping News brought attention to what operation,
was it the deed of paper Clippings on the Vat of a Man,
the Camp of a Fire side Chatter,
the dancing of the stars in the twitch of a deep light,
or could the harp see chord have been over turned as the next true Museum piece for the Cruise in Vestment.

Boating is a Oar said to be A Paddles engine to the Horsepower of a stretch on the Lombard,
such games is in normal affairs to such a Headlights lumber,
for the groves of timbering is of great desk on picture this film 'Eyes Wide Shut' in the dam,
than atop the fact that the Media dives any a long with all scenes to the Negative of plus got,
wise is the clock to put to the plates license on the shore,
it is the sands of how the grit is made however whom is the clam, the Oyster or the muscle to a Jam??

Is it in deed the Box Office at a Ticket Priced to purchase for the door of appeals,
does the story speak on be Half of the truth to the act, or, of the act shunned for gross Profits,
does the Script by Word of jaws angle to Screen the Hollywood Lot as a formal thrifty disposal sight,
in order And on the purchase to the gust of the fan see that it would otherwise drop a balm shell with a lashes touch,
in a variable on the grow in a springtime for a knot see,
The Season of a Raise In as the tow Mate toes roast in dry lamps,
should Park Road have brought a Simple Reason to Wisdom of this Writer of the Future at the time,
it was most definitely the Watch to the type of A tack used,
for the Sad dull is most usually the screaming technique of quantity laughter at the hoarse's bay POE knee,
this is why language communicates from Bit piece attached to not only the Reins but the basic Bridle as A tell.

See Bisque Skit

Row 'Sham' Bow,
tick Tack toe.

Please Sir Can I Have Sum/Some More Marsh Mellows Like Grahams Also Bill To Rock n Role On HBO's Big Brothers Holding Company

Lets play base Ball,
three Strikes you're Out.

Lets play foot Ball,
oh wait that is a Yard.

Lets play ground dead sport terms,
a stage for the Waltz,
with a Walker as a hound,
back to the Mule teach,
just say Carol.

A Paul Owe was a Manned Mission to the Moon,
lets say that rock it left a trace,
now what was it,
The Feat or the Faced??

either Ways its A shoe,
now Who's the laced,
I know That cruise by Name noun And ed just a fies the Movie,
film true Cock tales with a book for the rise.

is it a drink receipt to verb,
hours on the read??
or is it as simple as the or sun wells register of that peter pie per Sweet??
subject goes directly to the controlled and legal pre-Script-shins farm a sees record.

Must herd with rock Paper scissors,
to Live at the rehearsal for a sheet??,
all on Real Time as the best of Seat or is It the sleeve of a Caller eye deed??

Threads to the Barren of a In dee Ring on the Snap crack Coal pop,
what is the branch on the after sewn,
cloth or the Coca Cola that March the Smoke In to this Human Be Inn's fee??

To date it is the per fume on EST stay louders Oh Beautiful purr Raid,
why is that the banked account to drive the line to this breech of contract,
 must be the Musk of the 'L' a font to the Dark Sit Tee of speech,
for I am eh part a call of the literal disaster of the said before the done,
elocution is the pronunciation of an act cent to dollar on the bot ole of this mess edges squint,
my best friend had a name,
Eden Sundown hanged himself to death in the garage of his parents home,
not a read neck,
not a beatnik,
but a snapped neck took his life,
chalk this text as a reflection to only the whiplash of a in car nation of ignorance on shades,
for in the Sun day of a Calendar I will time the Watch to accommodate the last week to knight,
John Oliver you're UP,
now Swing a Way 'cause its All about them there 'Signs' status sole Mel Gibson,
 roles in addition players tray is talking BART for the games in America,
payphone or sell phone,
staring the classic Movie on theater piece of Utube clips of all on Oliver's pour Ridge
'Conspiracy Theory'

Gee Que From Bill Mayer On What Is The Truth On A Talk Show Cuddling A Milker On Top Pick Subjection Or Is It Enter *Ject Shin

More Fee US on the read bill owes of the Chimney of a Roof,
the skull to a brains Tree is as Pot is to plant,
that knee Grow on the grow Sir,
what Of the Floss ease of string to the Waxpaper on a Tin Foil of **SA ran wrapped??

Does the stagger to the swaying limb burr make haste to a Week nest on trial Nations lever,
the sage in the cool dare of threads,
a putter in the Golf Game of lawn,
to mirror the tack of Weed??

Ivy is an interesting Honeysuckle to the Organ,
pump the product place meant to in tied,
round the fountain pen to light in up,
joint the a Fair and Wash the title tasting Real Time.

Is it a Shoe of the Priced to fixed,
are the bars just a lyrics prose,
is the platter folding a Nap a tend,
for the good conscious of harbor to boat the Shipping News.

Shed talk is the tool of shoveling a bundle of Wad,
in that is the Suit a tie with that bit of Mug on tee,
Clubs are the Tease Parties to a Dan rather at Roast,
these are just those Awards that Trophy to the Obvious on the Tongue,
as Any Cart is the carriage of a Harness to the Hames of life on the Rein.

Marking that fox in the Hen House as an Egg layer,
but what of the shake,
is that then the bush Ole of corn to Maze??

Is the Wage on a Tick it To Ride the Horse of bigger T 'V' a Numb burr or device??
does the toe back go package the Smoke as to say that its a diced,
or is the simple railroad take the Wares of division to Drift of a liced,
as the lo Kissed gamble the roo let to Win status quota with a dirty rice,
would not that make the Anchor of a bay be in with the Inn Crowd on delivery in Stead??,
that perfect family of know response to the staff of skill on Men Shinned so Off tend,
for as the Original Home Box Office pursed the directional Media,
was not the enter view on that core shore of greater importance to that cast stir oils louse On Report.

*The Latin word root ject means 'throw.' Many common words are 'thrown' about each day which use this root, including eject, reject, object, and projector. Perhaps a pointed way to help remember this word is when you receive an injection, which is a shot 'thrown' into your body

1. seaman apprentice.

Nike Said To Just Due It Sew That Is A Wrap Sure On The Lime Lights Mister

This is a can deed M&M Brand Name on Skit^Tolls of a Modern day at Set^ole,
olive Ur on the dutch is Mar Bar on the touch,
rise to the Pick Ole's and that brings Science to a tall Owe gee or Is it Cue,
just a Magazine for the Readers to listen to the TOK 20/20 Got A Bone,
like picking out the frog on the hoof of a barefoot horse but in edition knowing The Shoe on the Forge,
the hammer as the nail is driven in with the Tools of what had been Tinned. 

No deaf A Niche shin is required,
as the chorus is the language on the Wire,
more over the top gun approach,
as in any good tangle its the comb that brushes it out.

Time on the clock is all sew known as On Deck,
a three-day event on the course of cross-country on the telephone poles of used to build a Jump stile,
should the men it Watch on the ride of the edge than its the three bank drop into the pond on the Splash,
through the work of grid stadium challenge,
its just an Arena on a Owe limb Pick sport of World Venue to the Greece in a drum,
for that is justly a beatnik from the burn bare ole's string on that Haight in an Ashbury theme.

Hip peas on a raise touching the Streets of San Francisco is a Creed,
dock ewe mints of chalk let outlines to sidewalk the curb of a chained fee,
for go to the Alcatraz on a Tour,
its story is As Old as the Engine itself,
mode US operate Tis the A Ma sheen to clearly said on the Rib Bing of a Wrap Sure on Ad-lib.

Misses doubt Fire on the skates of the outs on the trades,
making what is the term to station a stealth,
stage the drop line to picking Whom is on the quilt,
what is a stitch but the laughter Under the Covers,
like a good Staff knowing Fifty shades of purr Pull is a true direction of the bird I pen.

Add the Piece Sign from born and raised,
that is the How on the Paint Store say,
now is the hour of more like a syn ewe of hoo dare,
treat the Marsh Mellows like a friend,
as both Graham with a bit of herb cain to abstract a News Papers lend,
for I hear on the Grapevine that Wine oh's and Weld duh's are truly a National Conversation to dollar stores spend. 

Can Sir Or Is It Real Fine Tow Back Oh

In Compass it is the Real time on sick a sell a knee Mi awe,
this the days is the Fact or the degree of grade to School of thought,
on Class is the burr dens of a done Gin on the ice of blocks of that Same ice Cube,
stretch the saying to include the Span 'ish' on that Concert of bravado to touch stone of a Purchase,
singing the lyres like a string of Rags on the Magazine racks at the grow^sir reads!!

There at the Register is the line,
the weight of Pop a rot see,
pick in the Hollywood for a Scooters tile,
toy lets that bring reach with a bit on the dial,
no not really 'cause that is plain faxed in the palm,
tell a phone the Mic. crow stat it icks White Noise,
from the sat a light to straight up dinner with a hi oh Sill view on *ver. dune.

Write their POE lease to a stage on the SAG of Wag the dog,
pad dole Ying to the yan see,
a Cow boy on the Men shin,
com Meant and while the know bravery greets,
it is the difference that a sitting trot knows how to post Well.

1. verse; verses.
2. version. Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2015.
Cite This Source

Letters Play The Get Tars Raise And Stewball Was A Racehorse

For in or dough Mess tick that is the beat sharp,
mill a tary rounds the duck as puddles from the foot work,
working notes out like a Bill Mayer comma deed act,
I put toward the real time on the drakes.

Puff the Magic Drag gone is a Show Live on the tell a Vision of earths Jack all,
in the shoe on that wall of the painted to tide icy is the bricks of method on stick,
figures 'They Live' is a movie barrel read,
butter Rump with Ass kicking Tee 'V' at the Time-slot to advantage First base at the ball Park.

I am Pitching a No-No to the base deck of John Oliver last Week tonight this is All aye got tempo clear,
in regard Bill Mayer on the Oh rye Lee fact or as link^In shed What's a Stock pen to the Core rowel,
must be the Outback on the Signage for a CB Radio to Nightmare the hour of a tech said,
clique Click clique is the operator on the stoned,
yep spoke the Venue for self Test a Mow knee is not in sure its positive take Won.

So in that is the skipping stones to perk coffee on the star bucks of cups and merry X mass,
for even jay len owes the Griffin for the name station on Hoo are ewes,
course desk to number address it ranks hear's toy lets pier,
might that be of can door or is the men ewe of a todays world on Wares wall dough,
classic talk that the seat belonged to yet another HBO defining Factor Score,
but what of the grease??

Oil and Gel Oh,
iron and straight tin,
curl relaxer,
shall the say lawn Smoke or Push the joint as a blunt too,
the Real Time once a pawn the store ease role`d the product Punch,
that is rather like guy On awe after before the sauna of a Jacuzzi Tale.

Sapere aude

My Mothers Farm House\


In the late ‘70s, the Doobie Brothers bought an old residential house way out in the woods in Montara, California, to use for rehearsals. Montara is located along the coast, about halfway between San Francisco and Half Moon Bay on Highway 1, and is conveniently located close to pretty much nothing except the biggest seasonal surf break on the west coast, known as Mavericks. But Montara wasn’t chosen for its surfing. It was chosen specifically because it was about equal travel time from and to where each member of the band lived at that point, whether driving down from Sonoma, up from Santa Cruz, or even flying in from L.A.

Part of my “behind-the-scenes” series on the band and its crew, this photo of Keith Knudsen, Pat Simmons, and Michael McDonald was taken in the kitchen of the house on a rehearsal break during which they were reviewing and discussing an arrangement for one of their new tunes.

The Alamo perk of Grant Road the rides on the Montara Mountain of the rein,
as that is the perfect to the listen of the Jam,
I sharp Pea tacked the rising Tied to the language of the Mule.
as Paul care Ole taught^see of the day as a Hymn to Satan as A teach,
of course the round pen trues this Pigeon on the finest of beach,
for both the sand and the dial is of extreme importance to the keys,
now bake this thirteen does Inn.

The back to riding Sport is a filed speech,
each state of opportunity the Mar bar Pipes those deep throat skills,
spell the name as a bill than recorded Live makes a sort of tongue,
tender on that is the allowance to a deck that 'joint' on the crack,
but for the because of The Home Box Office the told trophies Allow A bowl,
the curious of an A mend mint to the Constitution on the variable of first person test a moan knee.

True to dock it form is the Information of the Foot ball games of sigh in Tall oh gee,
cue for the Pool Party on the shadow of the Must Drive to and fro,
the pun so indicative that makes the pet troll a bridge to Giant a Sheet,
yet it is the portion of the dial on the Soaps that special a get a Way to talk the Score.

So hear We are,
listening to the Card,
the pick-up is a give in,
that Mall of a Dust Jackets onion,
frogs and belly calls,
Junk on the Which Craft is a Pyre's Clued,
swept by the Corner of a Tenderloin chute.

In Real Time My Mother Had A Farm Just Down The Road From The Doobie Brothers And I Loved Riding By As They Actually Rocked!!

Problem of induction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For the mathematical technique, see Mathematical induction.
The problem of induction is the philosophical question of whether inductive reasoning leads to knowledge understood in the classic philosophical sense,[1] since it focuses on the alleged lack of justification for either:
  1. Generalizing about the properties of a class of objects based on some number of observations of particular instances of that class (for example, the inference that "all swans we have seen are white, and, therefore, all swans are white", before the discovery of black swans) or
  2. Presupposing that a sequence of events in the future will occur as it always has in the past (for example, that the laws of physics will hold as they have always been observed to hold). Hume called this the principle of uniformity of nature.[2]
The problem calls into question all empirical claims made in everyday life or through the scientific method and for that reason the philosopher C. D. Broad said that "induction is the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy". Although the problem arguably dates back to the Pyrrhonism of ancient philosophy, as well as the Carvaka school of Indian philosophyDavid Hume introduced it in the mid-18th century, with the most notable response provided by Karl Popper two centuries later.

Formulation of the problem[edit]

Usually inferred from repeated observations: "The sun always rises in the east".

Usually not inferred from repeated observations: "If someone dies, it's never me".
In inductive reasoning, one makes a series of observations and infers a new claim based on them. For instance, from a series of observations that a woman walks her dog by the market at 8am on Monday, it seems valid to infer that next Monday she will do the same, or that, in general, the woman walks her dog by the market every Monday. That next Monday the woman walks by the market merely adds to the series of observations, it does not prove she will walk by the market every Monday. First of all, it is not certain, regardless of the number of observations, that the woman always walks by the market at 8am on Monday. In fact, Hume would even argue that we cannot claim it is "more probable", since this still requires the assumption that the past predicts the future. Second, the observations themselves do not establish the validity of inductive reasoning, except inductively.

Ancient and early modern origins[edit]

Pyrrhonian skeptic Sextus Empiricus first questioned the validity of inductive reasoning, positing that a universal rule could not be established from an incomplete set of particular instances. He wrote:[3]
When they propose to establish the universal from the particulars by means of induction, they will effect this by a review of either all or some of the particulars. But if they review some, the induction will be insecure, since some of the particulars omitted in the induction may contravene the universal; while if they are to review all, they will be toiling at the impossible, since the particulars are infinite and indefinite.
The focus upon the gap between the premises and conclusion present in the above passage appears different from Hume's focus upon the circular reasoning of induction. However, Weintraub claims in The Philosophical Quarterly[4] that although Sextus's approach to the problem appears different, Hume's approach was actually an application of another argument raised by Sextus:[5]
Those who claim for themselves to judge the truth are bound to possess a criterion of truth. This criterion, then, either is without a judge's approval or has been approved. But if it is without approval, whence comes it that it is truthworthy? For no matter of dispute is to be trusted without judging. And, if it has been approved, that which approves it, in turn, either has been approved or has not been approved, and so on ad infinitum.
Although the criterion argument applies to both deduction and induction, Weintraub believes that Sextus's argument "is precisely the strategy Hume invokes against induction: it cannot be justified, because the purported justification, being inductive, is circular." She concludes that "Hume's most important legacy is the supposition that the justification of induction is not analogous to that of deduction." She ends with a discussion of Hume's implicit sanction of the validity of deduction, which Hume describes as intuitive in a manner analogous to modern foundationalism.
The Carvaka, a materialist and skeptic school of Indian philosophy, used the problem of induction to point out the flaws in using inference as a way to gain valid knowledge. They held that since inference needed an invariable connection between the middle term and the predicate, and further, that since there was no way to establish this invariable connection, that the efficacy of inference as a means of valid knowledge could never be stated.[6][7]
The 9th century Indian skeptic, Jayarasi Bhatta, also made an attack on inference, along with all means of knowledge, and showed by a type of reductio argument that there was no way to conclude universal relations from the observation of particular instances.[8][9]
Medieval writers such as al-Ghazali and William of Ockham connected the problem with God's absolute power, asking how we can be certain that the world will continue behaving as expected when God could at any moment miraculously cause the opposite.[10] Duns Scotus however argued that inductive inference from a finite number of particulars to a universal generalization was justified by "a proposition reposing in the soul, 'Whatever occurs in a great many instances by a cause that is not free, is the natural effect of that cause.'"[11] Some 17th-century Jesuits argued that although God could create the end of the world at any moment, it was necessarily a rare event and hence our confidence that it would not happen very soon was largely justified.[12]

David Hume[edit]

Few philosophers are as associated with induction as David Hume. He described the problem in An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, §4, based on his epistemologicalframework. Here, "reason" refers to deductive reasoning and "induction" refers to inductive reasoning.
First, Hume ponders the discovery of causal relations, which form the basis for what he refers to as "matters of fact". He argues that causal relations are found not by reason, but by induction. This is because for any cause, multiple effects are conceivable, and the actual effect cannot be determined by reasoning about the cause; instead, one must observe occurrences of the causal relation to discover that it holds. For example, when one thinks of "a billiard ball moving in a straight line toward another",[13] one can conceive that the first ball bounces back with the second ball remaining at rest, the first ball stops and the second ball moves, or the first ball jumps over the second, etc. There is no reason to conclude any of these possibilities over the others. Only through previous observation can it be predicted, inductively, what will actually happen with the balls. In general, it is not necessary that causal relation in the future resemble causal relations in the past, as it is always conceivable otherwise; for Hume, this is because the negation of the claim does not lead to a contradiction.
Next, Hume ponders the justification of induction. If all matters of fact are based on causal relations, and all causal relations are found by induction, then induction must be shown to be valid somehow. He uses the fact that induction assumes a valid connection between the proposition "I have found that such an object has always been attended with such an effect" and the proposition "I foresee that other objects which are in appearance similar will be attended with similar effects".[14] One connects these two propositions not by reason, but by induction. This claim is supported by the same reasoning as that for causal relations above, and by the observation that even rationally inexperienced people can infer, for example, that touching fire causes pain. Hume challenges other philosophers to come up with a (deductive) reason for the connection. If a deductive justification for induction cannot be provided, then it appears that induction is based on an inductive assumption about the connection, which would be begging the question. Induction, itself, cannot validly explain the connection.
In this way, the problem of induction is not only concerned with the uncertainty of conclusions derived by induction, but doubts the very principle through which those uncertain conclusions are derived.[15]

Nelson Goodman’s New Riddle of Induction[edit]

Main article: New riddle of induction
Nelson Goodman presented a different description of the problem of induction in the third chapter of Fact, Fiction, and Forecast entitled "The New Riddle of Induction" (1954). Goodman proposed a new predicate, "grue". Something is grue if and only if it has been observed to be green before a certain time and blue after that time. The "new" problem of induction is, since all emeralds we have ever seen are both green and grue, why do we suppose that after time T we will find green but not grue emeralds? The problem here raised is that two different inductions will be true and false under the same conditions. In other words:
– Given the observations of a lot of green emeralds, someone using a common language will inductively infer that all emeralds are green (therefore, he will believe that any emerald he will find will be green, even after T).
– Given the same set of observations of green emeralds, someone using the predicate "grue" will inductively infer that all emeralds, which will be observed after T, will be blue, despite the fact that he observed only green emeralds so far.
Goodman, however, points out that the predicate "grue" only appears more complex than the predicate "green" because we have defined grue in terms of blue and green. If we had always been brought up to think in terms of "grue" and "bleen" (where bleen is blue before time T, or green thereafter), we would intuitively consider "green" to be a crazy and complicated predicate. Goodman believed that which scientific hypotheses we favour depend on which predicates are "entrenched" in our language.
W.V.O. Quine offers a practicable solution to this problem[16] by making the metaphysical claim that only predicates that identify a "natural kind" (i.e. a real property of real things) can be legitimately used in a scientific hypothesis.

Notable interpretations[edit]


Although induction is not made by reason, Hume observes that we nonetheless perform it and improve from it. He proposes a descriptive explanation for the nature of induction in §5 of the Enquiry, titled "Skeptical solution of these doubts". It is by custom or habit that one draws the inductive connection described above, and “without the influence of custom we would be entirely ignorant of every matter of fact beyond what is immediately present to the memory and senses.”[17] The result of custom is belief, which is instinctual and much stronger than imagination alone.[18]

David Stove and Donald Williams[edit]

David Stove's argument for induction was presented in the Rationality of Induction and was developed from an argument put forward by one of Stove's heroes, the late Donald Cary Williams (formerly Professor at Harvard) in his book The Ground of Induction.[19] Stove argued that it is a statistical truth that the great majority of the possible subsets of specified size (as long as this size is not too small) are similar to the larger population to which they belong. For example, the majority of the subsets which contain 3000 ravens which you can form from the raven population are similar to the population itself (and this applies no matter how large the raven population is, as long as it is not infinite). Consequently, Stove argued that if you find yourself with such a subset then the chances are that this subset is one of the ones that are similar to the population, and so you are justified in concluding that it is likely that this subset "matches" the population reasonably closely. The situation would be analogous to drawing a ball out of a barrel of balls, 99% of which are red. In such a case you have a 99% chance of drawing a red ball. Similarly, when getting a sample of ravens the probability is very high that the sample is one of the matching or "representative" ones. So as long as you have no reason to think that your sample is an unrepresentative one, you are justified in thinking that probably (although not certainly) that it is.[citation needed]

Karl Popper[edit]

Karl Popper, a philosopher of science, sought to solve the problem of induction.[20][21] He argued that science does not use induction, and induction is in fact a myth.[22] Instead, knowledge is created by conjecture and criticism.[23] The main role of observations and experiments in science, he argued, is in attempts to criticize and refute existing theories.[24]
According to Popper, the problem of induction as usually conceived is asking the wrong question: it is asking how to justify theories given they cannot be justified by induction. Popper argued that justification is not needed at all, and seeking justification "begs for an authoritarian answer". Instead, Popper said, what should be done is to look to find and correct errors.[25] Popper regarded theories that have survived criticism as better corroborated in proportion to the amount and stringency of the criticism, but, in sharp contrast to the inductivist theories of knowledge, emphatically as less likely to be true.[26] Popper held that seeking for theories with a high probability of being true was a false goal that is in conflict with the search for knowledge. Science should seek for theories that are most probably false on the one hand (which is the same as saying that they are highly falsifiable and so there are lots of ways that they could turn out to be wrong), but still all actual attempts to falsify them have failed so far (that they are highly corroborated).
Wesley C. Salmon criticizes Popper on the grounds that predictions need to be made both for practical purposes and in order to test theories. That means Popperians need to make a selection from the number of unfalsified theories available to them, which is generally more than one. Popperians would wish to choose well-corroborated theories, in their sense of corroboration, but face a dilemma: either they are making the essentially inductive claim that a theory's having survived criticism in the past means it will be a reliable predictor in the future; or Popperian corroboration is no indicator of predictive power at all, so there is no rational motivation for their preferred selection principle.[27]
David Miller has criticized this kind of criticism of Salmon and others because it makes inductivist assumptions.[28] Popper does not say that corroboration is an indicator of predictive power. The predictive power is in the theory itself, not in its corroboration. The rational motivation for choosing a well-corroborated theory is that it is simply easier to falsify: Well-corroborated means that at least one kind of experiment (already conducted at least once) could have falsified (but did not actually falsify) the one theory, while the same kind of experiment, regardless of its outcome, could not have falsified the other. So it is rational to choose the well-corroborated theory: It may not be more likely to be true, but if it is actually false, it is easier to get rid of when confronted with the conflicting evidence that will eventually turn up. Accordingly, it is wrong to consider corroboration as a reason, a justification for believing in a theory or as an argument in favor of a theory to convince someone who objects to it.[29]

For In Or Dough Mess Stick Tare A Is Um Shows The Monitor Of A Cue Cards Laugh Track

Dance the spark to the splash of the rising water shore,
its the stun that said Its rice,
bouncing on the sunlight like its a ball at Tide lights stall,
these mirror reflections quarry a see,
memory of windows with the Wind Shields wiping skids to laugh the stoned As rock.

A disk in the Sky as the blues shape a Globes tile,
there it shows,
blank its and just rides,
for the sake of the back show at the green room adding dollar stores to sides,
this port is off in tree,
 short this fun Stun,
while in the hop to bounce that squall.

Halt scry`d the rollers on the Waves of solve,
over on that ocean of waters on the Sat,
dive to the bends in the turners of bridge pro^pane,
it is just the compass on a directional type state.

Dirt marks the dig to the shovels on stacked,
life is the world that shorts the lens touching left,
comprehend on an understanding to verses gone a Spring.

Strip it all Out to be aware of a bee,
honey drinks to the Vodka strain a bit of Ice Cube raised,
ditches for the jumps and fields of Jung,
book Library on the piers,
in the Mid of a cats stride I'll supply The Sugar Cane of plainly speaking See and Aitch.

Singing to the language of the set Ancient speak,
did you ground Electric just for the door of  fastrak Talk at goes to only slam the brand,
was the language of the Crib shed with elbow snore,
each Map Other true to form has bore the Toll to bridge deplore.

Does the Noise chatter to a type of Hand or the prints of Fingers on tray??,
the Screen act tore's guild is trough of stage ankle shackle paid,
but what 'if' all that suppose had been for this reason and Wisdom had lived to ready morsel??

What 'if' the practice of hours on the sit to file the write had a Scribe in the sound of Real Life at shrugged,
what 'if' all that compass was to per Happens of Training so that life would door to skates??,
now the theater will snot know a sleeve of My in tell of rivers filled with the salt of my tears long.

Sleeve the seat to that laid on the credits of bet auditions with a good ole speaking puppets raft,
boating to the Oar of a paddling slapped Thigh or is it The Clapping of an Audience bead,
getting the Part so to ride the formal Movie House with a Poster board on the lathe,
nude to a born as the natural Shacked the talk as just a over the wait of sat back to Puddle prose,
in the time to the tell of the information Hi way the character would perfect this gave,
but in truth Who is on first,
What is on Second,
and You don't know Who's on third,
'cause its not a riddle its a social joke kicking the skeet like a rifling of the words on this sheet,
just Ask fill dawn A hue.