Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Hist^stir^read Of Thought On-Line tell^lean Once the Blue Ink, Or, is it Eh Signature piece Of Vocal recognition Ignition to Rock salt??

Alan Colmes on too for Tuesday understand Ding the text of Commerce; the E!^Vol. at Cause to vocal aspect in dehydrate shin on a Coy^In. This place of Wayne Coats on the move^ease to rock the salt of on the Role's brings Choir at the mess^in^{de(day?)^jure's lox?? {Cream cheese] with a [smile] lean^kneeing eh brew of Tee} Leaves as the Class of In^vase^Shun or is it the balance of the Ream Job to binder the Three Ring Circus of . . . .an older saying touching in reality Kennedy and clocks??
Here’s What To Expect On Super Tuesday – Alan Colmes 2.29

" So instead of doing the interview with you, we went with the real talent, Alan Colmes… ..... “It's all double-dutch to us."

...."panels and opportunities for casual conversation with some of the ..... Step up to Dutch Masters and smile brother smile, Quisp and Quake, ... cent blog @ < arts and culture « Only The Blog Knows Brooklyn
onlytheblogknowsbrooklyn.com/category/arts-and-culture/
Dec 1, 2015 - On Wednesday, December 2, at 6PM, Katie Halper interviews Dr. ... the Alan Colmes Show, Sirius radio (which hung up on her once). ..... Tuesday, May 12 at 8PM ..... panels and opportunities for casual conversation with some of the ..... Step up to Dutch Masters and smile brother smile, Quisp and Quake, ..."

Shared publicly on google+ at on the Ticket of Mister Dopplerson and his Hymn to dutch; time cheque 4 something!!



Archaic humans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Dawn men" redirects here. For the stone circle, see Dawn's Men.
Homo rhodesiensis "Broken Hill Cranium": dated to either 130,000 years ago (using amino acid racemization determination) or 800,000 to 600,000 years ago (within the same time as Homo erectus), depending on which dating method is used.
A number of varieties of Homo are grouped into the broad category of archaic humans in the period beginning 500,000 years ago (or 500ka). It typically includes Homo neanderthalensis (40ka-300ka), Homo rhodesiensis (125ka-300ka), Homo heidelbergensis (200ka-600ka), and may also include Homo antecessor (800ka-1200ka).[1] This category is contrasted with anatomically modern humans, which includeHomo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens idaltu.
Modern humans are theorized to have evolved from archaic humans, who in turn evolved from Homo erectus. Varieties of archaic humans are sometimes included under the binomial name "Homo sapiens" because their brain size is very similar to that of modern humans. Archaic humans had a brain size averaging 1200 to 1400 cubic centimeters, which overlaps with the range of modern humans. Archaics are distinguished from anatomically modern humans by having a thick skull, prominent brow ridges and the lack of a prominent chin.[1][2]
Anatomically modern humans appear from about 200,000 years ago and after 70,000 years ago (see Toba catastrophe theory) gradually marginalize the "archaic" varieties. Non-modern varieties of Homo are certain to have survived until after 30,000 years ago, and perhaps until as recent as 10,000 years ago. Which of these, if any, are included under the term "archaic human" is a matter of definition and varies among authors. Nonetheless, according to recent genetic studies, modern humans may have bred with "at least two groups" of ancient humans:Neanderthals and Denisovans.[3] Other studies have cast doubt on admixture being the source of the shared genetic markers between archaic and modern humans, pointing to an ancestral origin of the traits originating 500,000 to 800,000 years ago.[4][5][6]
New evidence suggests another group may also have been extant as recently as 11,500 years ago, the Red Deer Cave people of China.[7]Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London has suggested that these people could be a result of mating between Denisovans and modern humans.[8] Other scientists remain skeptical, suggesting that the unique features are within the variations expected for human populations.[9]

Terminology and definition[edit]

Anatomical comparison of the skulls of anatomically modern humans "wise men" (left) and Homo neanderthalensis (right)
The category archaic human lacks a single, agreed upon definition.[1] According to one definition,Homo sapiens is a single species comprising several subspecies that include the archaics and modern humans. Under this definition, modern humans are referred to as Homo sapiens sapiensand archaics are also designated with the prefix "Homo sapiens". For example, the Neanderthals are Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, and Homo heidelbergensis is Homo sapiens heidelbergensis. Other taxonomists prefer not to consider archaics and modern humans as a single species but as several different species. In this case the standard taxonomy is used, i.e.Homo rhodesiensis, or Homo neanderthalensis.[1]
The dividing lines that separate modern humans from archaic Homo sapiens and archaics fromHomo erectus are unclear. The earliest known fossils of anatomically modern humans such as theOmo remains from 195,000 years ago, Homo sapiens idaltu from 160,000 years ago, and Qafzehremains from 90,000 years ago are recognizably modern humans. However, these early modern humans do exhibit a mix of some archaic traits, such as moderate, but not prominent, brow ridges.

Brain size expansion[edit]

The emergence of archaic humans is sometimes used as an example of punctuated equilibrium.[10] This occurs when a species undergoes significant biological evolution within a relatively short period. Subsequently, the species undergoes very little change for long periods until the next punctuation. The brain size of archaic humans expanded significantly from 900 cubic centimeters in erectus to 1300 cubic centimeters. Since the peak of human brain size during the archaics, it has begun to decline.[11]

Origin of language[edit]

Main article: Origin of language
Robin Dunbar has argued that archaic humans were the first to use language. Based on his analysis of the relationship between brain size and hominin group size, he concluded that because archaic humans had large brains, they must have lived in groups of over 120 individuals. Dunbar argues that it was not possible for hominins to live in such large groups without using language, otherwise there could be no group cohesion and the group would disintegrate. By comparison, chimpanzees live in smaller groups of up to 50 individuals.[12][13]

Fossils[edit]

Further information: List of human evolution fossils

at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)